Horton v. Tyson Foods
| Carla Horton |
| Tyson Foods |
| 9:2021cv00127 |
| July 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Ron Clark |
| Zack Hawthorn |
| Michael J Truncale |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE to the Court by Carla Horton (ljw, ) |
| Filing 13 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Carla Horton on 9/1/21 as to #11 Order to Conduct Rule 26(f) Conference.(ljw, ) |
Filing 12
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE. For effective disposition of cases in the Eastern District of Texas, this Lufkin civil case is hereby transferred from Judge Ron Clark to Judge Michael Truncale. Signed by District Judge Ron Clark on 8/24/21. (ljw, )
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER TO CONDUCT RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE. The case is SET for a Rule 16 management conference before the undersigned Magistrate Judge on Monday, November 1, 2021 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom No. 6, Jack Brooks Federal Building, 300 Willow Street, Beaumont, Texas. Signed by Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn on 8/23/21. (ljw, )
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Elizabeth L Bolt on behalf of Tyson Foods (Bolt, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Tyson Foods identifying Corporate Parent Tyson Foods, Inc. for Tyson Foods. (Herring, Danielle) |
| Filing 8 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Tyson Foods.(Herring, Danielle) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by USM. Tyson Foods served on 8/3/2021, answer due 8/24/2021. (ljw, ) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued as to Tyson Foods and mailed to USM for service. (ljw, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court shall issue process and the United States Marshal shall serve process via certified mail return receipt requested upon Tyson Foods at the aforementioned address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn on 7/26/21. (ljw, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER denying #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel subject to reconsideration at a later stage of the proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn on 7/26/21. (ljw, )
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Carla Horton. (ljw, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Carla Horton. (ljw, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tyson Foods, filed by Carla Horton.(ljw, ) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn. (ljw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Horton v. Tyson Foods | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carla Horton | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Tyson Foods | |
| Represented By: | Danielle Kujawa Herring |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth L Bolt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
