England v. Bush et al
Michael England |
James E. Bush, Kyler B. Franklin, Arturo A. Dominguez and Denise Carr |
9:2021cv00274 |
October 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Ron Clark |
Zack Hawthorn |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number TXE100021274 (tkd, ) |
Filing 5 RESPONSE to #2 Preliminary Filing Fee Order filed by Michael England. (ljw, ) |
Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint filed by Michael England.This case should be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Signed by Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn on 11/29/21. (ljw, ) |
Filing 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Michael England on 11/2/21 as to #2 Preliminary Filing Fee Order. (ljw, ) |
Filing 2 PRELIMINARY FILING FEE ORDER. It is ORDERED that plaintiff shall, within twenty (20) days from the date set forth below, submit either the $402.00 filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis and a statement certified by an authorized prison official showing the average balance in and deposits into plaintiffs inmate trust account for the preceding six months. Signed by Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn on 10/20/2021. (ttp, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights) against All Defendants, filed by Michael England.(ljw, ) |
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn. (ljw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.