Hartless v. The State Of Texas
| Jerry D. Hartless |
| The State of Texas |
| 9:2022cv00075 |
| May 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Thad Heartfield |
| Christine L Stetson |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 FINAL JUDGMENT that this Petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed without prejudice. All motions not previously ruled on are denied. A certificate of appealability will not be issued. Signed by District Judge Thad Heartfield on 6/27/2022. (bjc, ) |
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's #7 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Thad Heartfield on 6/27/2022. (bjc, )
|
| Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Jerry D. Hartless on 5/13/22 as to #7 Report and Recommendations.(ljw, ) |
| Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint filed by Jerry D. Hartless. This Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus should be dismissed without prejudice as a successive petition, filed without authorization from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson on 5/9/22. (ljw, ) |
| Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of Texas Southern; Case Number 4:22-cv-01324. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson. (ljw, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE to USDC ED/TX- Lufkin. (Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(gclair, 4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 5/5/2022.]
|
| Interdistrict transfer to USDC ED/TX- Lufkin. Case transferred electronically. Case terminated on 5/4/2022, filed. (gclair, 4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 5/5/2022.] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (RachelWillborg, 4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 5/5/2022.] |
| Filing 3 MOTION by Jerry D. Hartless, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/16/2022. (RachelWillborg, 4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 5/5/2022.] |
| Filing 2 STATEMENT by Witnesses, filed by Jerry D. Hartless. (RachelWillborg, 4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 5/5/2022.] |
| Filing 1 PETITION/COMPLAINT for Writ of Mandamus (Filing fee $ 402) filed by Jerry D. Hartless. (Attachments: #1 Summary, #2 Table of Contents, #3 Cover Letter) (RachelWillborg, 4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 5/5/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hartless v. The State Of Texas | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jerry D. Hartless | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: The State of Texas | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
