Powell v. City of Rusk, TX et al
Plaintiff: Jennifer Powell
Defendant: City of Rusk, TX and Daniel Moore
Case Number: 9:2022cv00081
Filed: May 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Michael J Truncale
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2022 Filing 6 SEALED NOTICE of Proposed Order Approving Minor Settlement by City of Rusk, TX (Neill, Erika)
July 13, 2022 Filing 5 Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Michael J. Truncale: Settlement Conference held on 7/13/2022. (Court Reporter April Hargett.) (jmv, )
July 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER SETTING HEARING. A hearing to approve the settlement as to the Minor Plaintiff, B.P., is set before this Honorable Court on July 13, 2022 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 2, Jack Brooks Federal Courthouse, 300 Willow Street, Beaumont, Texas. Signed by District Judge Michael J. Truncale on 7/1/22. (ljw, )
May 25, 2022 Filing 3 Defendants' Original ANSWER to #1 Complaint by City of Rusk, TX, Daniel Moore.(Neill, Erika)
May 24, 2022 ***FILED IN ERROR. Document # 2, Answer to Complaint. PLEASE IGNORE. Attorney to re-file making sure to redact the minors name.*** (ljw, )
May 24, 2022 Filing 2 PLEASE IGNORE, ATTORNEY TO REFILE Defendants' Original ANSWER to #1 Complaint by City of Rusk, TX, Daniel Moore.(Neill, Erika) Modified on 5/25/2022 (ljw, ).
May 23, 2022 Case assigned to District Judge Michael J. Truncale. (ljw, )
May 23, 2022 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ljw, )
May 21, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-8937185.), filed by Jennifer Powell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Franklin, Tanner)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Powell v. City of Rusk, TX et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Powell
Represented By: Tanner Gerald McClure Franklin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Rusk, TX
Represented By: Erika Leigh Neill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Moore
Represented By: Erika Leigh Neill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?