Salinas v. "STG" Gang Intelligence et al
| Gabino Salinas |
| "STG" Gang Intelligence, Davite Flores and H.C.S.O |
| 9:2022cv00113 |
| August 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Zack Hawthorn |
| Thad Heartfield |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Case transferred from Texas Eastern has been opened in SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS as case 7:22-cv-00311, filed 08/31/2022.(ljw, )
|
|
(PLEASE IGNORE, USED WRONG EVENT)Intradistrict Transfer to Southern District of Texas, McAllen Division. (ljw, )
|
|
Interdistrict transfer to the Southern District of Texas McAllen Division. (ljw, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER that the Clerk of Court shall TRANSFER this action to the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, McAllen Division. Signed by Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn on 8/4/22. (ljw, )
|
|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING VENUE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn on 8/4/22. (ljw, )
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Gabino Salinas. (ljw, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT (42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights) against All Defendants, filed by Gabino Salinas.(ljw, )
|
|
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn. (ljw, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
