Moseley v. Polk et al
| Gary Moseley |
| O Balden Polk, Shannarcus Preston, Heather O'Dell and FNU Maralvet |
| 9:2022cv00126 |
| August 26, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Thad Heartfield |
| Christine L Stetson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER for Initial Partial Filing Fee of $241.29 within 30 days for Gary Moseley.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson on 10/6/2022. (bjc, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall transfer the above-styled action to the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of TX, Lufkin Division. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson on 8/29/2022. (bjc, )
|
| Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING VENUE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson on 8/29/2022. (bjc, ) |
| Case transferred in from Beaumont Division on 08/29/2022. Case Number 1:22-cv-353. Case assigned to District Judge Thad Heartfield.(ljw, ) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson. (ljw, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Gary Moseley. (bjc, ) |
| Filing 1 42:1983 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Gary Moseley.(bjc, ) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson. (bjc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
