United States of America v. Ruger Vaquero Revolver SN:5783260 et al
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Ruger Vaquero Revolver SN:5783260, India Ishapore 2A1 Rifle SN:X4796 and Hatfield Gun Company SAS Shotgun SN:20A17003872
Case Number: 9:2022cv00150
Filed: October 3, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Christine L Stetson
Referring Judge: Michael J Truncale
Nature of Suit: Forfeit/Penalty: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2022 Filing 4 WARRANT of Arrest in Rem issued (bjc, )
October 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER FOR WARRANT of Arrest in Rem. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson on 10/5/2022. (bjc, )
October 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 REFERRAL ORDER. Pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (3), it is ORDERED that the this matter is REFERRED to United States Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson for all pretrial matters. Signed by District Judge Michael J. Truncale on 10/4/22. (ljw, )
October 4, 2022 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ljw, )
October 4, 2022 Case assigned to District Judge Michael J. Truncale. (ljw, )
October 3, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Forfeiture in Rem against All Defendants, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Warrant of Arrest In Rem, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(McClendon, J)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Ruger Vaquero Revolver SN:5783260 et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: J Kevin McClendon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ruger Vaquero Revolver SN:5783260
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: India Ishapore 2A1 Rifle SN:X4796
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hatfield Gun Company SAS Shotgun SN:20A17003872
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?