Taylor v. Payne et al
Christopher Scot Taylor |
James Payne, Karren Price, LeAnn Rafferty, Allison Harbuson, John Price, Kevin Windham, Ruth Gonzales, Holly Hammons and Dexter Jones |
9:2023cv00210 |
November 15, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Lufkin Office |
Marcia A Crone |
Christine L Stetson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #2 Complaint filed by Christopher Scot Taylor. This civil action should be dismissed for want of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson on 1/3/24. (ljw, ) |
Filing 10 ORDER that the #9 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is denied as not in proper form, but subject to reconsideration upon receipt of a certified income trust statement for the preceding six month period. Plaintiff has twenty (20) days from entry below to file a certified income trust statement for the preceding six month period. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson on 11/30/23. (ljw, ) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher Scot Taylor. (ljw, ) |
Filing 8 ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mail Plaintiff a copy of an in forma pauperis application for prisoners. Plaintiff has thirty (30) days from entry below to either pay the full filing fee of $402.00 and/or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis accompanied with a certified income trust statement for the preceding six month period. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson on 11/20/2023. (bjc, ) |
Filing 7 ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall TRANSFER this action to the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson on 11/17/2023. (bjc, ) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding venue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson on 11/17/2023. (bjc, ) |
Case transferred in from Beaumont Division Division on 11/17/2023 Case Number 1:23-cv-411. Case assigned to District Judge Marcia A. Crone..(bjc, ) |
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson. (bjc, ) |
Filing 5 NOTICE to the court by Christopher Scot Taylor (bjc, ) |
Filing 4 Copy of documents filed in Shelby County by Christopher Scot Taylor. (bjc, ) (Originally filed in 1:23cv389) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss state court case by Christopher Scot Taylor. (bjc, ) (Originally filed in 1:23cv389) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Christopher Scot Taylor.(bjc, ) (Originally filed in 1:23cv389) |
Filing 1 ORDERED that the claims of each Plaintiff shall proceed as separate actions. Joe Daniel Adams will remain the Plaintiff in this civil action number. The Clerk of Court is directed to SEVER the claims of Plaintiffs Taylor and Jones into separate actions and assign each lawsuit a separate civil action number. Document number 1 shall be filed as the initial pleading in each of the severed cases. Document number 9 shall be stricken from this case and filed in Mr. Taylors case. Document 10 shall also be filed in both severed cases. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson on 11/14/2023. (bjc, ) (Originally filed in 1:23CV389) |
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson. (bjc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.