Blanks v. Royal Moving & Storage LLC
| Charles A.G. Blanks |
| Royal Moving & Storage LLC |
| 9:2026cv00495 |
| July 3, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 49 U.S.C. ยง 11702 (a)(4) Violations of Interstate Commerce A |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CASE OPENING ERROR by Attorney. Case Terminated without a Judge Assignment. (ljw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Blanks v. Royal Moving & Storage LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Charles A.G. Blanks | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Royal Moving & Storage LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
