MaidPro Franchise, LLC v. Lifeclean Corporation et al
| MaidPro Franchise, LLC |
| Lifeclean Corporation, Christopher Aric Hancock, Stephanie L. Iguess Hancock, Krystal Deann Crick and Pine and Polish Cleaning Company, LLC |
| 9:2026cv00766 |
| September 17, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1836 (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to issue Summons in a Civil Action filed by MaidPro Franchise, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons in a Civil Action - S. Hancock, #2 Summons in a Civil Action - Pine and Polish, #3 Summons in a Civil Action - Crick, #4 Summons in a Civil Action - C. Hancock)(Eisenberg, Jared) |
| Filing 2 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by MaidPro Franchise, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Threshold Brands LLC for MaidPro Franchise, LLC. (Eisenberg, Jared) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Krystal Deann Crick, Christopher Aric Hancock, Stephanie L. Iguess Hancock, Lifeclean Corporation, Pine and Polish Cleaning Company, LLC ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-11806852.), filed by MaidPro Franchise, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits to Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Counsel is reminded to file form required by LR CV-4(a).)(Eisenberg, Jared) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
