Armstrong v. Astrue

Armstrong v. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Bobby Ray Armstrong
Defendant:	Michael J Astrue
Case Number:	1:2008cv00045
Filed:	May 6, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office
County:	Nolan
Presiding Judge:	Philip R Lane
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:	42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 22, 2009	Filing 25 ORDER ADOPTING finding and conclusions in the 24]Report and Recommendations as the findings and conclusions of the court and that this cause is reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to 405 U.S.C.§ 405(g). (Ordered by Judge Sam R Cummings on 9/22/09) (rlw)
September 2, 2009	Filing 24 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS on case: Magistrate Judge Philip R Lane no longer assigned to case. This court recommends that the United States district judge reverse the Commissioners decision and remand this case for further proceedings in accordance w ith this recommendation. Plaintiff having refused consent to having the United States magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in this case, this case is TRANSFERRED back to the docket of the United States district judge. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Philip R Lane on 9/2/09) (jgf)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 22, 2009

Filing 25 ORDER ADOPTING finding and conclusions in the 24]Report and Recommendations as the findings and conclusions of the court and that this cause is reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to 405 U.S.C.§ 405(g). (Ordered by Judge Sam R Cummings on 9/22/09) (rlw)

September 2, 2009

Filing 24 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS on case: Magistrate Judge Philip R Lane no longer assigned to case. This court recommends that the United States district judge reverse the Commissioners decision and remand this case for further proceedings in accordance w ith this recommendation. Plaintiff having refused consent to having the United States magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in this case, this case is TRANSFERRED back to the docket of the United States district judge. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Philip R Lane on 9/2/09) (jgf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Armstrong v. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bobby Ray Armstrong
Represented By:	Walter L Shipman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?