Mitchell v. Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice et al
| Costroma Mitchell |
| Patrick Swanner, Dennis Melton, FNU Lofton, Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice, Brad Livingston, Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID, Eddie Wheeler, FNU Leal, FNU Hooper, FNU Lawson and Wendy Doane |
| 1:2011cv00045 |
| March 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Abilene Office |
| Taylor |
| Philip R Lane |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
Memorandum Opinion and Order IT IS ORDERED THAT: Plaintiffs claims against each of the named Defendants in their individual, official, or supervisory capacities are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS FRIVOLOUS; Plaintiffs due process claims and free exerci se claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS FRIVOLOUS; and Plaintiffs claims under RLUIPA are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS FRIVOLOUS. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. This dismissal shall count as a qualifying dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 19 15(g) and Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383 (5th Cir. 1996). Dismissal of this action does not release Plaintiff or the institution where he is incarcerated from the obligation to pay any filing fee previously imposed. See Williams v. Roberts, 116 F.3d 1126, 1128 (5th Cir. 1997). Any pending motions are DENIED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge E. Scott Frost on 12/3/2011) (chmb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
