Mayberry v. Anderson et al
| Marcus Dwayne Mayberry |
| Larry Anderson, Gary Johnson, Frank Hoke and V Barrow |
| 1:2012cv00152 |
| August 27, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Abilene Office |
| Potter |
| E. Scott Frost |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
Memorandum Opinion and Order. The court finds that Plaintiff has failed to state a cognizable constitutional claim against any Defendant for deprivation of access to the court. It is, therefore, ordered that all such claim(s) against all Defendant (s) are dismissed with prejudice as frivolous. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. This dismissal shall count as a qualifying dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383 (5th Cir. 1996). Dismissal of this action does not release Plaintiff or the institution where he is incarcerated from the obligation to pay any filing fee previously imposed. See Williams v. Roberts, 116 F.3d 1126, 1128 (5th Cir.1997).Any pending motions are denied.A copy of this order shall be sent by first-class mail to all parties appearing pro se. Any attorney of record shall be notified electronically or by first-class mail. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge E. Scott Frost on 11/20/2012) (chmb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
