Flores v. Stephens
Petitioner: Adriel Demetrio Flores
Respondent: William Stephens
Case Number: 1:2015cv00038
Filed: February 24, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Abilene Office
County: Bowie
Presiding Judge: Jorge A Solis
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 16 Findings and Recommendations on Case. It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. It is further ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. All relief not expressly granted is denied and any pending motions are hereby denied. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 11/29/2016) (jak)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Flores v. Stephens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Adriel Demetrio Flores
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William Stephens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?