Rodriguez v. Parker et al
Elizabeth Rodriguez |
Stan Parker, Marc Thomas and Charlotte Stovall |
1:2015cv00181 |
September 25, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Abilene Office |
Howard |
E. Scott Frost |
Jorge A Solis |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 53 ORDER. The Court finds that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 41 and 43 are correct and adopts them as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, Defendant Stan Parker's Motion to Dismiss 15 is GRANTED, D efendant Charlotte Stovall's Motion to Dismiss filed 11/6/15 16 is DENIED as moot, and Defendant Charlotte Stovall's Motion to Dismiss filed 1/7/16 34 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Stan Parker and Charlotte St ovall are DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff's request to amend her pleadings a third time is DENIED. The reassignment to the undersigned judge is terminated and this case remains assigned to Magistrate Judge E. Scott Frost pursuant to the Second Amended Special Order No. 3-301. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 8/5/2016) (mmg) |
Filing 42 ORDER accepting Report and Recommendations re 40 Report and Recommendations on Case.; granting Marc Thomas's 20 Motion for Summary Judgment and DISMISSES Plaintiff's claims against him. Marc Thomas is no longer a defendant in this action. (Ordered by Chief Judge Jorge A Solis on 4/20/2016) (jgf) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.