Parker v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Sheila Dawn Parker
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 1:2016cv00178
Filed: September 28, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Abilene Office
County: Taylor
Presiding Judge: E. Scott Frost
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 17 Order. It is ORDERED that the findings and conclusions in the 16 Report and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court, that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, and that this cause is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 3/28/2018) (jak)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parker v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sheila Dawn Parker
Represented By: Laura Kathryn Funk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?