Freeman v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID et al
| Antonio Freeman |
| Melony Nelson, FNU Gonlazes, FNU Jacob, Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and Joshua Boyer |
| 1:2018cv00185 |
| November 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sam R Cummings |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
JUDGMENT. For the reasons stated in the Court's Order of even date, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's civil rights complaint is dismissed with prejudice as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii). (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 12/4/2018) (jak)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER. For the reasons stated herein, it is ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff's complaint and all claims alleged therein are DISMISSED with prejudice as frivolous or malicious. (2) Freeman's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is GRANTED. The full filing fee of $350.00 is assessed against Plaintiff and shall be paid by the agency having custody of Plaintiff in monthly installments as provided in 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). (3) This dismissal shall count as a qualifying dismissal under 28 U.S.C. 1915 and 1915A, and 42 U.S.C. 1997e. Plaintiff is cautioned he has accumulated at least three strikes; therefore, he may not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. (4) All pending motions are denied. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Plaintiff is cautioned that if he continues to file frivolous complaints, motions, or other documents, sanctions will be imposed against him. Such sanctions may include monetary sanctions, the dismissal of a complaint with prejudice, and/or a complete bar to filing pleadings without leave of the Court. (Clerk note: TDCJ Inmate Trust Office has been electronically notified of this order.) (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 12/4/2018) (jak)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6, 7. Tue Dec 4 14:05:56 CST 2018 (crt) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE (Motion: Misuse of Official Authority) filed by Antonio Freeman. (jak) |
| Filing 4 Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Antonio Freeman. (jak) |
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (jak) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (jak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Antonio Freeman. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s)) (jak) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2, 3. Wed Nov 14 11:39:01 CST 2018 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
