Hill v. Union Pacific Railroad Co
Plaintiff: Nathan Hill
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Co
Case Number: 1:2019cv00108
Filed: May 10, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Sam R Cummings
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 27 JUDGMENT: For the reasons stated in the Court's Order of even date, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the above-styled and -numbered civil action be DISMISSED,with prejudice. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 8/24/2020) (jak)
August 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 26 Order: On this day, the Court considered the Parties' Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice #25 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all claims asserted in the above-styled and -numbered civil action are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with costs taxed against the party incurring the same-except as agreed otherwise. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 8/24/2020) (jak)
August 17, 2020 Filing 25 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL by Union Pacific Railroad Co. (Miller, Heather)
August 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 24 PROTECTIVE ORDER: This Order is made under Fed. R. Civ. P.26(c) and governs any document, information, or other thing furnished by any party to any other party, and it includes any non-party who receives a subpoena in connection with this action. See Order for further instructions. (**Clerk's note: this Order terminates #23 Joint Motion for Protective Order per SRC chambers.) (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 8/6/2019) (jak)
August 5, 2019 Filing 23 Joint MOTION for Protective Order Entry of Agreed filed by Union Pacific Railroad Co (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Miller, Heather)
July 15, 2019 Filing 22 ANSWER to #18 Amended Complaint filed by Union Pacific Railroad Co. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Miller, Heather)
July 8, 2019 Filing 21 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Union Pacific Railroad Co (First Discovery Requests to Plaintiff) (Miller, Heather)
July 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER: Having reviewed the docket in this civil action, the Court hereby ORDERS that Defendant's #8 Motion to Partially Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) be DENIED AS MOOT following the filing of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, as said Motion now addresses a non-live pleading. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 7/2/2019) (jak)
July 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 19 SCHEDULING ORDER: Motions to join other parties and amend the pleadings must be filed by 3:00 p.m. on November 1, 2019. Motions for summary judgment must be filed by 3:00 p.m. on October 1, 2020. Motions in limine must be filed and discovery must be completed by 3:00 p.m. on March 15, 2021. This case is set for trial at 9:00 a.m. on 4/5/2021 in US Courthouse, Courtroom 2000, 341 Pine St., Abilene, TX 79601-5928 before Senior Judge Sam R Cummings. See Order for further instructions. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 7/2/2019) (jak)
July 1, 2019 Filing 18 AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Union Pacific Railroad Co filed by Nathan Hill. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Thompson, Nicholas)
July 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER: The Court hereby sua sponte ORDERS that Plaintiff file an amended complaint by no later than 3:00 p.m. on July 10, 2019. The Court further ORDERS that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss be held in ABEYANCE pending the filing of Plaintiff's amended complaint. Failure to file an amended complaint and/or plead sufficient facts necessary to support the claims at issue will result in the granting of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 7/1/2019) (jak)
June 24, 2019 Filing 16 RESPONSE filed by Nathan Hill re: #8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Thompson, Nicholas)
June 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting #14 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Robert L. Orbals, Jr.. If not already done, Applicant must register as an ECF User within 14 days (LR 5.1(f)). (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 6/17/2019) (jak)
June 14, 2019 Filing 14 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing (Filing fee $25; Receipt number 0539-10053708) filed by Union Pacific Railroad Co (Attachments: #1 Certficate of Good Standing) (Ortbals, Robert)
June 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Nicholas D. Thompson. If not already done, Applicant must register as an ECF User within 14 days (LR 5.1(f)). (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 6/14/2019) (jak)
June 13, 2019 Filing 12 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing (Filing fee $25; Receipt number 0539-10049793) filed by Nathan Hill (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Certifcate of Good Standing, #4 Certifcate of Good Standing)Attorney Nicholas Delton Thompson added to party Nathan Hill(pty:pla) (Thompson, Nicholas)
June 12, 2019 Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Union Pacific Railroad Co. (Miller, Heather)
June 12, 2019 Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint filed by Union Pacific Railroad Co. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Miller, Heather)
June 12, 2019 Filing 9 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Union Pacific Railroad Co re #8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A Charge) (Miller, Heather)
June 12, 2019 Filing 8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Union Pacific Railroad Co (Miller, Heather)
June 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: The Court is of the opinion that the Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead #6 should be GRANTED. Accordingly, Defendant is hereby ordered to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by no later than 3:00 p.m. on June 12, 2019. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 6/6/2019) (jak)
June 5, 2019 Filing 6 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Plead filed by Union Pacific Railroad Co Attorney Heather Marie Miller added to party Union Pacific Railroad Co(pty:dft) (Miller, Heather)
May 15, 2019 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Union Pacific Railroad Co ; served on 5/15/2019. (MacLean, John)
May 14, 2019 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Nathan Hill. (MacLean, John) (Main Document 4 replaced on 5/14/2019) (jak).
May 10, 2019 Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. (jak)
May 10, 2019 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Union Pacific Railroad Co. (jak)
May 10, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Union Pacific Railroad Co filed by Nathan Hill. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-9978471) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (MacLean, John) (Attachment 1 replaced on 5/10/2019) (jak). Modified on 5/13/2019 (jak).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hill v. Union Pacific Railroad Co
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Co
Represented By: Heather Marie Miller
Represented By: Robert L Ortbals, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nathan Hill
Represented By: John R Scotty MacLean
Represented By: Nicholas Delton Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?