Agnew v. Sheriff of Colorado City, TX et al
Petitioner: Norman L Agnew
Respondent: Sheriff of Colorado City, TX, State of Texas and Linda Gonzales
Case Number: 1:2019cv00142
Filed: June 25, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Sam R Cummings
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 JUDGMENT. For the reasons stated in the Court's Order of even date, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the above-styled and -numbered cause is dismissed without prejudice. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 7/30/2019) (mmg)
July 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order. The Court finds that the petition for writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum should be DENIED. The Petition is DISMISSED without prejudice to Petitioner's right to seek relief from the trial court. Any request for a certificate of appealability should be denied. All relief not expressly granted should be denied and any pending motions should be denied. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 7/30/2019) (mmg)
July 30, 2019 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5, 6. Tue Jul 30 12:23:35 CDT 2019 (crt)
June 25, 2019 Filing 4 Interstate Corrections Compact (ICC) All Writs Act 28 U.S.C. 1651(a) filed by Norman L Agnew. (jak)
June 25, 2019 Filing 3 Certificate of Trust Account by Norman L Agnew TDCJ # 02172850. (jak)
June 25, 2019 Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Norman L Agnew. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (jak)
June 25, 2019 Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) (jak)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Agnew v. Sheriff of Colorado City, TX et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Sheriff of Colorado City, TX
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Texas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Linda Gonzales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Norman L Agnew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?