Blair v. Bishop

Petitioner: Randy Steven Blair
Respondent: Ricky Bishop
Case Number: 1:2019cv00163
Filed: August 1, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Sam R Cummings
Referring Judge: James Wesley Hendrix
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2019 Filing 6 Status Request by Randy Steven Blair with Deputy Clerk Response. (Attachments: #1 Pro Se response) (jmc) (Attachment 1 replaced on 9/16/2019) (jmc).
August 13, 2019 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:. Tue Aug 13 14:54:38 CDT 2019 (crt)
August 9, 2019 Filing 5 Pursuant to Special Order 3-331 the clerk is to reassign all cases assigned to Judge Cummings that do not appear on Exhibit A to the docket of US District Judge Wes Hendrix, and all such cases are to carry the suffix letter "H." (The clerk has mailed a copy to all non-ECF users.) (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 8/9/2019) (lrl)
August 5, 2019 Filing 4 Order and Notice of Deficiency: Randy Steven Blair must address the following deficiency: failure to pay the filing fee or file an Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. It is ORDERED Petitioner shall pay the $5.00 filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis and a certificate of his inmate trust account within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Failure to comply with this Order may result in the dismissal of this action without further notice. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 8/5/2019) (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis) (jak)
August 5, 2019 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Mon Aug 5 14:10:12 CDT 2019 (crt)
August 1, 2019 Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (jak)
August 1, 2019 Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Randy Steven Blair. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Additional pages) (jak)
August 1, 2019 Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) (jak)
August 1, 2019 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3. Thu Aug 1 10:34:09 CDT 2019 (crt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Blair v. Bishop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ricky Bishop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Randy Steven Blair
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?