Lopez v. Saul
Martha Lopez |
Andrew Saul |
Social Security Administration - Interested Party |
1:2020cv00003 |
January 3, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
James Wesley Hendrix |
John R Parker |
Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER. On February 25, 2020, Plaintiff paid the requisite $400.00 filing fee, rendering her application to proceed in forma pauperis moot. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is DENIED as moot. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge John R. Parker on 2/26/2020) (jmc) |
Filing 8 Payment for #1 Complaint,,,, filed by Martha Lopez. ($400; Receipt number 0539-10651462). (Giordano, Thomas) |
Filing 7 ORDER UNFILING DOCUMENT. The Court has determined there are defects in the document filed January 31, 2020 by Plaintiff Martha Lopez, titled Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #6 . Because of these defects, the Court has determined that the document indicated above should be unfiled from the records of this action. Therefore, the Court ORDERS that this document be, and is hereby, unfiled, and the Clerk is directed to note on the docket the unfiling of this document. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge John R. Parker on 2/3/2020) (jmc) |
Filing 6 ***UNFILED PER ORDER #7 *** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Martha Lopez (Giordano, Thomas) Modified on 2/3/2020 (jmc). |
Filing 5 Order for Additional Financial Information: Martha Lopez must address the following deficiency: complete the attached Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form). Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 14 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge John R. Parker on 1/28/2020) (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s) IFP) (jmc) |
Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Parker (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (jmc) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Martha Lopez. (Giordano, Thomas) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Martha Lopez (Giordano, Thomas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul filed by Martha Lopez. (Filer fee note- IFP motion in complaint or to be filed) Clerk to issue summons(es) if the motion to proceed IFP is granted. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Giordano, Thomas) |
Magistrate Judge John R. Parker added. (jmc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.