Andres v. Barr et al
Plaintiff: Oscar Andres
Defendant: Bobby Thompson and William P Barr
Case Number: 1:2020cv00036
Filed: February 20, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: James Wesley Hendrix
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2020 Filing 6 RESPONSE filed by Oscar Andres re: #5 Order And Notice of Deficiency. (jak)
March 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Notice of Deficiency and Order : Plaintiff did not use the court-approved form for civil-rights complaints, nor did he pay the filing fee or submit a proper application to proceed in forma pauperis with a certified statement of his inmate trust account. The Court finds that Plaintiff should, within 20 days from the date of this order, pay the filing fee of $400.00 or file with the Clerk the documents listed herein. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 3/2/2020) (Attachments: #1 1983 Complaint Form, #2 Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis) (jak)
March 2, 2020 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Mon Mar 2 11:46:55 CST 2020 (crt)
February 20, 2020 Filing 4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis filed by Oscar Andres. (jak)
February 20, 2020 Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (jak)
February 20, 2020 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Oscar Andres. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (jak)
February 20, 2020 Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (jak)
February 20, 2020 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 3. Thu Feb 20 14:08:17 CST 2020 (crt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Andres v. Barr et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bobby Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William P Barr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Oscar Andres
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?