Webster v. Middleton Unit
| Bobby Webster, Jr |
| Middleton Unit |
| 1:2020cv00117 |
| May 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| James Wesley Hendrix |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Order to Open a New Civil-Rights Action and Notice of Deficiency: Plaintiff filed a copy of an I-60 medical request dated May 12, 2020, and an offender grievance form dated April 21, 2020, complaining that he has been trying to get medical attention at the Middleton Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) since March 27, 2020 24. The Court finds that the documents should be construed as a new civil-rights action and proceed independent of this case. The Clerk is directed to (1) unfile Dkt. No. 24 from the docket in this case; (2) open a new civil-rights action under 42 U.S.C. 1983 using the I-60 and grievance form as the original complaint; and (3) docket a copy of this order in the new case. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with his Middleton Unit claims, Plaintiff must, within 20 days from the date of this Order, pay the filing fee or file an Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis together with certified statement of his inmate trust account. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 5/27/2020) (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s) 1983 Form, #2 Additional Page(s) IFP) (jmc)
|
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (jmc) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (jmc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Middleton Unit filed by Bobby Webster, Jr. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (jmc) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2, 3, 4. Wed May 27 16:09:51 CDT 2020 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Webster v. Middleton Unit | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Bobby Webster, Jr | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Middleton Unit | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
