Jackson v. Davis et al
1:2020cv00118 |
May 27, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Abilene Office |
Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Motion for Injunction and Restraining Order filed by Roy Jackson. **Clerk's note: see page 4 of Complaint #1 for request for injunction and restraining order. (jak) |
Filing 9 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (jak) |
Filing 8 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (jak) |
Filing 7 Case electronically transferred in from District of Texas Southern; Case Number 4:20-cv-01811. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas should seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Copy of NEF to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed. |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5, 6, 8, 9. Thu May 28 09:03:34 CDT 2020 (crt) |
Filing 6 ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE to US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Abilene Division (Signed by Judge Vanessa D Gilmore) Parties notified.(jdav, 4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 5/28/2020.] |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION granting #3 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and transferring this case to the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Abilene Division. (Signed by Judge Vanessa D Gilmore) Parties notified.(jdav, 4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 5/28/2020.] |
Interdistrict transfer to US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Abilene Division. Case transferred electronically. Case terminated on 5/28/2020, filed. (jdav, 4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 5/28/2020.] |
Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (ChristopherSarrat, 4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 5/28/2020.] |
Filing 3 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Roy Jackson, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/12/2020. (ChristopherSarrat, 4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 5/28/2020.] |
Filing 2 ****DOCKETED IN ERROR**** APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Roy Jackson.(ChristopherSarrat, 4) Modified on 5/26/2020 (ChristopherSarrat, 4). Modified on 5/26/2020 (ChristopherSarrat, 4). [Transferred from Texas Southern on 5/28/2020.] Modified on 5/28/2020 (jak). |
Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400) filed by Roy Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Envelope)(ChristopherSarrat, 4) Modified on 5/26/2020 (ChristopherSarrat, 4). [Transferred from Texas Southern on 5/28/2020.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jackson v. Davis et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.