Walker v. Abilene Police Department
| Joshua Neil Walker |
| Abilene Police Department |
| 1:2020cv00138 |
| June 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| James Wesley Hendrix |
| John R Parker |
| Torts/Pers Prop: Other Personal Property Damage |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER. Before the Court are Joshua Neil Walker's Motion for Return of Personal Property and the government's response #1 and #4 . In sum, Walker seeks return of a cellular phone, and the government opposes his request because (1) the government is not in actual or constructive possession of the phone, and (2) Walker has state-law remedies available. The Court denies Walker's motion with prejudice because he fails to state a claim on which relief can be granted. For the reasons stated in this Order, Walker's motion is denied with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is ordered to terminate this case. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 6/19/2020) (jmc)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Fri Jun 19 16:40:51 CDT 2020 (crt) |
| Filing 4 Government's Response to #3 (originally filed in 1:19-cr-097-H). (jak) |
|
Filing 3
Order (originally docketed in 1:19-cr-097-H on 06/04/2020): Before the court is Joshua Neil Walker's Motion for Return of Personal Property #1 . The government is ordered to file its response by June 26, 2020. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 6/18/2020) (jak)
|
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Parker (see Special Order 3). No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (jak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Abilene Police Department filed by Joshua Neil Walker. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Order in 1:19-cr-097-H) (jak) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2, 3. previously docketed in 1:20-cv-138 Thu Jun 18 16:14:17 CDT 2020 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Walker v. Abilene Police Department | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Abilene Police Department | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joshua Neil Walker | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
