Stadler v. USA
Francis Leo Stadler, Jr |
USA |
1:2020cv00219 |
October 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Mark Pittman |
Prisoner Pet: Motions to Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Notice of Substitution of Counsel by AUSA. Stephen S Gilstrap added as AUSA. (Gilstrap, Stephen) |
Filing 5 Public correspondence filed, deputy clerk response attached, received from Francis Leo Stadler, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Pro Se Response Letter) (jak) (Attachment 1 replaced on 11/12/2020) (jak). |
Filing 4 Notice of Substitution of Counsel by AUSA. Jonathan Glen Bradshaw-DOJ added as AUSA. (Bradshaw-DOJ, Jonathan) |
Filing 3 Order and Instructions to Parties in a Motion Under 28 U.S.C. 2255: Service upon the United States of America of the motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255, the memorandum in support thereof, all motions filed in this matter by Defendant, this order, and any other order pertinent to the case shall be served electronically on the United States attorney for the Northern District of Texas. The clerk has served this order and will regenerate notice of the motion and supporting documents to the designated Assistant US Attorney. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 10/23/2020) (jak) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3. Fri Oct 23 14:12:23 CDT 2020 (crt) |
Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (amg) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Criminal Case Number 1:19-cr-070) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. **Clerk's note: Copy of filings mailed to Petitioner at address on correspondence. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law) (amg) |
New Case Notes: A filing fee is not due for this case. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: staff attorney DK. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (amg) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Thu Oct 22 11:59:54 CDT 2020 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Stadler v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Francis Leo Stadler, Jr | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: USA | |
Represented By: | Jonathan Glen Bradshaw-DOJ |
Represented By: | Stephen S Gilstrap |
Represented By: | Leigha A Simonton-DOJ |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.