Stadler v. USA
Petitioner: Francis Leo Stadler, Jr
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 1:2020cv00219
Filed: October 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Mark Pittman
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 8, 2020 Filing 6 Notice of Substitution of Counsel by AUSA. Stephen S Gilstrap added as AUSA. (Gilstrap, Stephen)
November 12, 2020 Filing 5 Public correspondence filed, deputy clerk response attached, received from Francis Leo Stadler, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Pro Se Response Letter) (jak) (Attachment 1 replaced on 11/12/2020) (jak).
October 28, 2020 Filing 4 Notice of Substitution of Counsel by AUSA. Jonathan Glen Bradshaw-DOJ added as AUSA. (Bradshaw-DOJ, Jonathan)
October 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order and Instructions to Parties in a Motion Under 28 U.S.C. 2255: Service upon the United States of America of the motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255, the memorandum in support thereof, all motions filed in this matter by Defendant, this order, and any other order pertinent to the case shall be served electronically on the United States attorney for the Northern District of Texas. The clerk has served this order and will regenerate notice of the motion and supporting documents to the designated Assistant US Attorney. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 10/23/2020) (jak)
October 23, 2020 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3. Fri Oct 23 14:12:23 CDT 2020 (crt)
October 22, 2020 Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (amg)
October 22, 2020 Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Criminal Case Number 1:19-cr-070) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. **Clerk's note: Copy of filings mailed to Petitioner at address on correspondence. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law) (amg)
October 22, 2020 New Case Notes: A filing fee is not due for this case. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: staff attorney DK. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (amg)
October 22, 2020 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Thu Oct 22 11:59:54 CDT 2020 (crt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stadler v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Francis Leo Stadler, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: Jonathan Glen Bradshaw-DOJ
Represented By: Stephen S Gilstrap
Represented By: Leigha A Simonton-DOJ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?