Rose v. Harper et al
Plaintiff: Bennie Lee Rose
Defendant: K Henry, ricky bishop, FNU Ker and H Harper
Case Number: 1:2021cv00008
Filed: January 6, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: James Wesley Hendrix
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 DEFICIENCY SHOW CAUSE ORDER. Plaintiff did not comply with the Court's Order of January 8, 2021, thus the Court finds that Plaintiff shall have 20 days from the date of this Order to file a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement or file a sworn affidavit or unsworn declaration made under penalty of perjury setting forth the specific steps he has taken to attempt to comply with the prior Order. If Plaintiff fails to respond to this Order, the Court will dismiss this cause without further notice. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 2/5/2021) (amg)
February 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REDESIGNATING MOTION. Motions terminated: #6 MOTION for Documents filed by Bennie Lee Rose. The United States District Clerk is directed to terminate the motion in this case and open a new habeas action (2254)(1:21-cv-00036-H). (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 2/5/2021) (amg) .
February 5, 2021 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No: 8, 9. Fri Feb 5 15:01:20 CST 2021 (crt)
January 19, 2021 Filing 7 Mail returned as undeliverable. #2 Hendrix, #3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party received back from Bennie Lee Rose as Not Deliverable as Addressed, Unable to Forward. Address updated from last filed document, #6 . New address: TDCJ Middleton Unit, 13055 FM 3522, Abilene, Texas 79601. The current document has been re-mailed. (amg)
January 12, 2021 Filing 6 **TERMINATED per Order at 8** MOTION for Documents, filed by Bennie Lee Rose. (amg) Modified on 2/5/2021 (amg).
January 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER. The Court finds that Plaintiff should, within 20 days from the date of this order, pay the filing fee of $402.00 or file with the Clerk a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint, certified by one of the officers at the institution where Plaintiff is incarcerated; Failure to file the required documents will result in the denial of in forma pauperis status and the dismissal of Plaintiff's complaint for want of prosecution without further notice, unless the filing fee of $402.00 is timely paid. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 1/8/2021) (amg)
January 8, 2021 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No: 5. Fri Jan 8 13:08:17 CST 2021 (crt)
January 6, 2021 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Bennie Lee Rose. (amg)
January 6, 2021 Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (amg)
January 6, 2021 Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (amg)
January 6, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Bennie Lee Rose. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (amg)
January 6, 2021 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No: 2, 3. Wed Jan 6 13:32:54 CST 2021 (crt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rose v. Harper et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bennie Lee Rose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: K Henry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ricky bishop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FNU Ker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: H Harper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?