Mitchell v. Tulsa Inspection Resources, LLC
Dustin Mitchell |
Tulsa Inspection Resources, LLC |
1:2021cv00179 |
September 24, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
James Wesley Hendrix |
Labor: Fair Labor Standards Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER. Before the Court is plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal per Rule 41(a)(l)(A)(i). Dkt No. #8 . Because the defendant has not filed an answer or motion for summary judgment, the Court instructs the Clerk of Court to dismiss this action without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(l)(A)(i), permitting dismissal of an action without a court order. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 10/20/2021) (jak) |
Civil Case Terminated. Voluntary Dismissal Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). (jak) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Dismissal without Prejudice Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) filed by Dustin Mitchell (Foty, Don) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Tulsa Inspection Resources, LLC ; served on 9/28/2021. (Foty, Don) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Filing Consent Form to Join Lawsuit Pursuant to 29 USC 216(b) filed by Dustin Mitchell (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Foty, Don) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Tulsa Inspection Resources, LLC. (amg) |
Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. (amg) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Dustin Mitchell. (Foty, Don) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to issue Summons as to Tulsa Inspection Resources, LLC filed by Dustin Mitchell. (Foty, Don) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tulsa Inspection Resources, LLC filed by Dustin Mitchell. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 0539-12247915) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Cover Sheet) (Foty, Don) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Mitchell v. Tulsa Inspection Resources, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Dustin Mitchell | |
Represented By: | Don J Foty |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Tulsa Inspection Resources, LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.