Toson v. Oconnor et al
| Durand Toson |
| Donovan R Oconnor, Thaddeus J Porter, Christopher J Schmidt, John Doe #1 1:22-cv-87, Veronica A Ference, Jennifer Crozby, Gregory Rodriguez, John Doe #2 1:22-cv-87, John Doe #3 1:22-cv-87 and John Doe #4 1:22-cv-87 |
| 1:2022cv00087 |
| June 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| James Wesley Hendrix |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
DEFICIENCY SHOW CAUSE ORDER. The Court finds that Plaintiff shall have 20 days from the date of this order to either pay the fee or file a signed application to proceed in forma pauperis and certified copy of his inmate trust account or file a sworn affidavit or unsworn declaration made under penalty of perjury pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746, setting forth the specific steps he has taken to attempt to comply with the prior order, or his reasons for failing to comply, and attach copies of any relevant consent forms or other supporting information to Plaintiff's sworn affidavit or unsworn declaration. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 8/4/2022) (skf) Modified docket text on 8/4/2022 (amg).
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No: 9. mailed to Durand Toson at TDCJ Robertson Unit on Thu Aug 4 16:42:07 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 8 Status Request by Durand Toson with Deputy Clerk Response. (Attachments: #1 Clerk's Response Letter) (skf) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:. Clerk's Response Letter mailed to Durand Toson at TDCJ Robertson Unit Wed Jul 20 11:35:04 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:. Copy of Notice and Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge mailed to Durand Toson at TDCJ Robertson Unit on Mon Jun 27 16:04:55 CDT 2022 (crt) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER. Plaintiff's request for preliminary injunctive relief 4 is denied. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 6/22/2022) (amg)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No: 7. mailed to Durand Toson at TDCJ Robertson Unit on Wed Jun 22 11:12:14 CDT 2022 (crt) |
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY. Plaintiff must address the following deficiency: Plaintiff did not pay the $402 filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis with a certificate of his inmate trust account. Therefore, by July 18, 2022 (30 days), Plaintiff is ORDERED to pay the $402 filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis on the approved form with the required certificate of inmate trust account. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Clerk will mail an application to proceed in forma pauperis to Plaintiff along with a copy of this order. It is Plaintiff's responsibility to obtain a certificate of his inmate trust account from the appropriate official at his prison unit. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 6/17/2022) (chmb)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC NOTICE OF JUDICIAL SCREENING AND STANDING ORDER: Judicial screening of this case is pending. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2); 28 U.S.C. 1915A(a). It is therefore ORDERED that (1) service of process will be withheld until judicial screening is complete, (2) no motions for appointment of counsel may be filed until the Court has completed the screening process, (3) all discovery in this case is stayed until an answer is filed or until further order, (4) no amendments or supplements may be filed without prior Court approval, and (5) any motion to amend the complaint must be accompanied by a complete proposed amended complaint on the required form. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff must promptly notify the Court in writing of any change of address. Failure to provide updated address information may result in the dismissal of the case under Fed. R. Civ. 41(b). (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 6/17/2022) (chmb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No: 5, 6. with application to proceed IFP mailed to Durand Toson at TDCJ Robertson Unit on Fri Jun 17 13:55:33 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Pre Injunction filed by Durand Toson. See #2 Complaint page 4, and, page 1 of attached additional pages. (skf) |
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (skf) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Durand Toson. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s)) (skf) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (skf) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No: 3,1. Mailed to Durand Toson at TDCJ Robertson Unit on Wed Jun 15 11:46:16 CDT 2022 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
