Rubio v. Norton et al
| Juan Rubio |
| Felipe Ochoa, Gregory Parks, Joe Ramos, III, Nathan Rangel, Anthony Willis, John Doe 1:22-cv-127, Cristal Ojeda, Justin McGrew and Robert Norton |
| 1:2022cv00127 |
| August 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| James Wesley Hendrix |
| John R Parker |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Administrative Record consisting of TDCJ Authenticated Records (1 CD), received and forwarded to JRP chambers. (amg) |
| Filing 12 Administrative Record consisting of TDCJ Authenticated Records, received and forwarded to JRP Chambers. (skf) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Juan Rubio re: #10 Judge's Questionnaire. (skf) |
Filing 10
ORDER TO COMPLETE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S QUESTIONNAIRE. Plaintiff is ORDERED to complete the attached Questionnaire. Plaintiff must certify under penalty of perjury that his answers to this Questionnaire are true by signing the included Certification. Plaintiff's responses to the Questionnaire and his Certification must both be returned to the United States District Clerk, Abilene Division, no later than October 3, 2022. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge John R. Parker on 9/12/2022) (skf)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER FOR AUTHENTICATED RECORDS. It is ORDERED that the officials listed in this order shall provide the Court with authenticated and verified copies of any and all records pertaining to the specific allegations in Plaintiff's Complaint, including any relevant videos or other surveillance video. The Clerk of Court is directed to provide the above officials with a copy of Plaintiff's Complaint #1 , and the Transfer Order #7 along with this Order. An authorized custodian of the records of the respective entity must execute the attached Certification of Business Records (Certification) and attach the executed Certification to the records provided to the Court. The records and executed Certification must be provided to the Court on or before October 10, 2022. The Clerk shall mail a copy of this order and Plaintiff's Complaint to the above-listed addresses. **Clerk's Note: Copy of Complaint and Transfer Order mailed to listed officials under cover of this order. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge John R. Parker on 9/12/2022) (skf)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE TO EXERCISE JURISDICTION. Plaintiff is notified that a United States Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to exercise the district court's full jurisdiction and to conduct all proceedings in this case, including through trial and final judgment, provided all parties voluntarily consent. If Plaintiff wishes to consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, Plaintiff must sign and date the consent form and return it to the United States District Clerk, Northern District of Texas, Abilene Division, within thirty (30) days from the receipt of this notice. The Clerk shall mail this notice and the attached consent form to Plaintiff. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge John R. Parker on 9/12/2022) (skf)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No: 8,9,10. mailed to Juan Rubio at TDCJ Robertson Unit on Mon Sep 12 16:45:59 CDT 2022 (crt) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER TRANSFERRING THE CASE TO THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The court is of the opinion that this case should be transferred to the docket of the Honorable John R. Parker, United States Magistrate Judge, for further proceedings. This case will now be numbered civil Action No. 1:21-CV- 00127-BU. The Magistrate Judge shall order the transfer of this case back to the docket of this Court and file proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) within 365 days from the date of this order in the following circumstances: the Plaintiff does not consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge; or the Plaintiff consents to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, but a Defendant does not consent. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 8/25/2022) (amg)
|
|
Filing 6
PLRA FILING FEE ORDER. After reviewing the application, the Court orders the following: Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. 1915. Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $190.42. Thereafter, Plaintiff must pay $159.58, the balance of the filing fee, in monthly installments as provided in 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). The Clerk will mail a copy of this order to the inmate accounting office or other person or entity responsible for assessing, collecting, and remitting to the Court the interim filing fee payments on behalf of inmates, as designated by the facility in which Plaintiff is confined. **Clerk note: TDCJ Inmate Trust Office has been electronically notified of this order. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 8/25/2022) (amg)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No: 6, 7. mailed to Juan Rubio at TDCJ Robertson Unit on Thu Aug 25 16:20:07 CDT 2022 (crt) |
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC NOTICE OF JUDICIAL SCREENING AND STANDING ORDER: Judicial screening of this case is pending. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2); 28 U.S.C. 1915A(a). It is therefore ORDERED that (1) service of process will be withheld until judicial screening is complete, (2) no motions for appointment of counsel may be filed until the Court has completed the screening process, (3) all discovery in this case is stayed until an answer is filed or until further order, (4) no amendments or supplements may be filed without prior Court approval, and (5) any motion to amend the complaint must be accompanied by a complete proposed amended complaint on the required form. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff must promptly notify the Court in writing of any change of address. Failure to provide updated address information may result in the dismissal of the case under Fed. R. Civ. 41(b). (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 8/23/2022) (chmb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. mailed to Juan Rubio at TDCJ Robertson Unit on Tue Aug 23 15:40:15 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Juan Rubio. (skf) (Main Document 4 replaced on 8/22/2022) (skf). |
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (skf) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (skf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Juan Rubio. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s)) (skf) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No: 3,2. mailed to Juan Rubio at TDCJ Robertson Unit on Mon Aug 22 16:18:17 CDT 2022 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
