Schrader et al v. Ranchland Wind Project, LLC et al
| Joan Parks Schrader, Testamentary Trust of Hugh Schrader, Hugh Schrader and John Schrader |
| Ranchland Wind Project, LLC and Ranchland Wind Project II, LLC |
| 1:2023cv00096 |
| May 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| James Wesley Hendrix |
| Contract: Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND REPORT FOR CONTENTS OF SCHEDULING ORDER. Lead counsel for each party (or a designee attorney with appropriate authority) and any unrepresented party shall confer at a scheduling conference as soon as practicable, but in any event no later than June 23, 2023. The Joint Report shall be filed on or before July 7, 2023. The filing of the Joint Report is mandatory. Lead counsel for plaintiff is responsible for initiating contact with opposing counsel and all unrepresented parties for the purpose of arranging the scheduling conference and preparing the Joint Report. Lead counsel for all parties and unrepresented parties are equally responsible for ensuring timely compliance with this order. At least one counsel for each party and all unrepresented parties shall sign the Joint Report prior to filing. See Order for additional instructions. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 6/12/2023) (amg)
|
| Filing 5 Second Civil Cover Sheet filed by Hugh Schrader, Joan Parks Schrader, John Schrader, Testamentary Trust of Hugh Schrader. (skf) |
| Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Hugh Schrader, Joan Parks Schrader, John Schrader, Testamentary Trust of Hugh Schrader. (skf) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Ranchland Wind Project II, LLC, Ranchland Wind Project, LLC. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF(Clerk added affiliates)). (Diamond, Adam) Modified on 5/9/2023 to add corporate parent entities (amg). |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. (amg) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Ranchland Wind Project II, LLC, Ranchland Wind Project, LLC. (Filing fee $402; receipt number ATXNDC-13721232) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement, #3 Exhibit(s) A - State Court Docket Sheet, #4 Exhibit(s) B - Index of State Court Documents, #5 Exhibit(s) B-1 - State Court Petition, #6 Exhibit(s) B-2 - Defendants State Court Answer, #7 Exhibit(s) C - Certificate of Interested Parties, #8 Exhibit(s) D - State Court Notice of Removal) (Diamond, Adam) (Attachment 1 and replaced on 5/8/2023 after flattening) (amg). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
