Tansimore-El v. Hadaway et al
James L Tansimore-El |
Shane Hadaway, Mike Fouts, Chris Keith and Dax Preshel |
1:2024cv00056 |
April 12, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
James Wesley Hendrix |
Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by James L Tansimore-El. (amg) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) (amg) |
Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (amg) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by James L Tansimore-El. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s)) (amg) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No: 2. mailed to James L Tansimore-El at Rolling Plains Detention Center on Fri Apr 12 09:32:54 CDT 2024 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.