Lopez Cantel v. Johnson et al
| Domingo Lopez Cantel |
| Marcello Villegas, Josh Johnson, Markwayne Mullin, Todd M Lyons and Todd Blanche |
| 1:2026cv00355 |
| July 21, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| James Wesley Hendrix |
| Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (skh) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) (skh) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Domingo Lopez Cantel. (Filing fee $5.00; receipt number 100000974) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (skh) Modified receipt number on 7/21/2026 (skh). |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3. mailed to Domingo Lopez Cantel at Bluebonnet Detention Center on Tue Jul 21 14:14:13 CDT 2026 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
