Johnson v. Grimes et al
Richard James Johnson |
Joe Grimes, NFN Rowlands, P Sloan, NFN Kelly, D Shipp, NFN Novak, NFN Haskins, P Kizer and NFN Gerraldo |
2:2007cv00191 |
September 12, 2007 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Amarillo Office |
Potter |
Clinton E Averitte |
Mary Lou Robinson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 ORDER Revoking Pauper Status and ORDER of Dismissal - ADOPTING 30 Report and Recommendation and Dismissing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint filed by Richard James Johnson. Ordered that Plaintiff's Pauper Status is revoked and the instant Civil Right Complaint is dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee. In the alternative, the Court finds Dfts have shown they are entitled to qualified immunity against plaintiff's claims and plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudic e. In the further alternative, plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice as frivolous and for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. 30 Report and Recommendation terminated. (Ordered by Judge Mary Lou Robinson on 9/20/2010) (djs) |
Filing 29 ORDER of Partial Dismissal. ADOPTING 21 Report and Recommendation. Ordered that the Civil Rights Claims against dft NFN Kelly and NFN Gerraldo are dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (Ordered by Judge Mary Lou Robinson on 3/30/2010) (djs) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.