Cervantes v. Weston et al
| Tony Cervantes |
| H Weston, G Davis, P Ponder, T Moore, R Burt, NFN Rodriguez, NFN Basse, NFN Cowden, NFN Winschel and NFN Abnernathy |
| 2:2008cv00182 |
| October 10, 2008 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Potter |
| Clinton E Averitte |
| Mary Lou Robinson |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER OF DISMISSAL ADOPTING 13 Report and Recommendation - This Court hereby adopts the R&R of the US Mag Judge in this case. Ordered that the civil rights complaint filed by pltf is dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with the requirements of FRCP 8 and without prejudice for failure to comply with an order of the court. All pending motions are denied. (Ordered by Judge Mary Lou Robinson on 3/16/09) (plh)
|
|
Filing
13
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Recommending that the Civil Rights Complaint be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 and without prejudice for failure to comply with an order of the Court. Objections due within 14 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Clinton E Averitte on 2/17/09) (djs) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/18/2009: # 1 word searchable format) (awc).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
