Hurrey v. Bell et al
| Andre William Hurrey |
| Patsy Bell and State of Texas A.G.'s Office |
| 2:2009cv00137 |
| June 17, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Amarillo Office |
| Potter |
| Clinton E Averitte |
| Mary Lou Robinson |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL ANALYZING NEW CLAIMS ASSERTED IN OBJECTIONS TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND OVERRULING OBJECTIONS -- This Court, therefore, does OVERRULE 11 Objection to Report and Recommendation, and does hereby ADOPT [1 0] Report and Recommendation, as supplemented herein. It is therefore ordered that 1 Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice as frivolous, without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. (Ordered by Judge Mary Lou Robinson on 10/23/2009) (awc)
|
|
Filing
10
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION -- It is the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge to the United States District Judge that the civil rights complaint filed by plaintiff Andre William Hurrey be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Clinton E Averitte on 10/1/2009) (awc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
