Ward v. Gomez et al
| Brian De Ward |
| Gary Gomez, NFN Morales, NFN Mendoza, NFN Janick, NFN Otts, NFN Jones, NFN Sloan, NFN Baker, NFN Goodwill, Unnamed Warden Jester 4, Ben White, Pamela Williams, Parole & Pardons, Unnamed Warden Walls Unit, Unnamed Warden Goree Unit, Clyde Collins and Kitris Kirk |
| 2:2009cv00204 |
| August 18, 2009 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Amarillo Office |
| Potter |
| Clinton E Averitte |
| Mary Lou Robinson |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER OF DISMISSAL - ADOPTING 9 Report and Recommendation. Ordered that the civil rights complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with Rule 8, FRCP and for failure to obey the Court's Order to provide the supporting financial disclosure to allow consideration of his request for pauper status. All pending motions are denied. (Ordered by Judge Mary Lou Robinson on 10/2/09) (plh)
|
Filing
9
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - Recommended by Mag Judge to Dist Judge that the civil rights complaint by pltf be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with Rule 8, FRCP and for failing to obey the Court's Order to provide the supporting financial disclosure to allow consideration of his request for pauper status. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Clinton E Averitte on 9/21/09) (plh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.