Graves v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Plaintiff: James E Graves
Defendant: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Case Number: 2:2010cv00183
Filed: August 2, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Amarillo Office
County: Armstrong
Presiding Judge: Clinton E Averitte
Presiding Judge: Mary Lou Robinson
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 39 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 30 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (Ordered by Judge Mary Lou Robinson on 5/27/2011) (djs)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Graves v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James E Graves
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?