Walker v. Hope et al
| Jason Walker |
| Patti Hope, Helen Kitchen, Rodney W Killough, Darren M Mayer, Ric Vogelgesang, Delores Carrizales, Jennifer Saldana, NFN Torres, Denise DeShields, Manuel Ramirez, Jr and G S David |
| 2:2015cv00178 |
| June 1, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Amarillo Office |
| Potter |
| Clinton E Averitte |
| Mary Lou Robinson |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND DENYING, IN PART, DEFENDANTS KITCHEN AND TORRES' MOTION TO DISMISS; AND ORDER DISMISSING ALL CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT TORRES -- This Court, therefore, does OVERRULE plaintiff's objections and the objections of d efendant KITCHEN, and does hereby ADOPT the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. The July 20, 2015 Motion to Dismiss by defendants KITCHEN and TORRES is GRANTED, IN PART, AND DENIED, IN PAR T. 2. The Civil Rights Complaint by JASON WALKER against NFN TORRES, Lab Technician, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM. re: 25 Report and Recommendation, 18 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(1). Party NFN Torres (Lab Technician) terminated. (Ordered by Judge Mary Lou Robinson on 9/10/2015) (awc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
