Castillo-Celaya v. USA
Petitioner: Francisco Castillo-Celaya
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 2:2017cv00097
Filed: May 26, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Amarillo Office
County: Potter
Presiding Judge: Clinton E. Averitte
Presiding Judge: Mary Lou Robinson
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION, AND DENYING MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE OR CORRECT SENTENCE and Denying Certificate of Appealability re: 12 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation. (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 11/22/2019) (awc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Castillo-Celaya v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Francisco Castillo-Celaya
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: Amanda R Burch-DOJ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?