Alvarado v. United States of America
Petitioner: Marisela Alvarado
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2017cv00227
Filed: November 21, 2017
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Amarillo Office
County: Potter
Presiding Judge: Lee Ann Reno
Presiding Judge: Mary Lou Robinson
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE OR CORRECT SENTENCE and Denying Certificate of Appealability re: 15 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation on Case re: 3 Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255, filed by Marisela Alvarado. (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 1/21/2021) (awc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alvarado v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Marisela Alvarado
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?