Gonzalez v. USA
Petitioner: Grabel Gonzalez
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 2:2018cv00038
Filed: March 1, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Amarillo Office
County: Potter
Presiding Judge: Sidney A Fitzwater
Presiding Judge: Lee Ann Reno
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER Adopting Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation and Denying Certificate of Appealability re: 7 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation on Case re: 2 Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255, filed by Grabel Gonzalez. Motion Granted: 5 MOTION to Dismiss Section 2255 Motion as Untimely Filed filed by USA. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 7/8/2019) (nhp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gonzalez v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Grabel Gonzalez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?