Cook v. Horsely et al
| Reyce Janon Cook |
| Charles R. Horsely, Joe Milburn, Matthew T Seymour, Jacob D Williams, NFN White, JANE DOE, John Doe and Carissa Norton |
| 2:2018cv00077 |
| April 19, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Amarillo Office |
| Walker |
| Sidney A Fitzwater |
| Lee Ann Reno |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
185
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION re: 184 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation. It is therefore ORDERED that the FCR of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED and Defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 5/28/2025) (awc)
|
|
Filing
173
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION re: 170 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation on Motion re: 155 Motion for Summary Judgment. It is therefore ORDERED that the findings, conclusions, andrecommendation of the Magistrate Judge are ADOPTED and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 6/5/2024) (awc)
|
|
Filing
110
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT: For the reasons set forth above and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A, 1915(e)(2) and 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), it is ORDERED that the Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 be DISMISSED with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 6/2/2021) (nhp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
