Ceno v. USA
Petitioner: Curtis Robert Ceno
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 2:2018cv00114
Filed: June 18, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Amarillo Office
County: Gray
Presiding Judge: Sidney A Fitzwater
Presiding Judge: Lee Ann Reno
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION ANDDENYING MOTIONS TO VACATE, SET ASIDE OR CORRECT SENTENCE AND FOR REDUCTION OF SENTENCE and Denying Certificate of Appealability re: 5 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 1 Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255, filed by Curtis Robert Ceno. (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 5/11/2020) (nhp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ceno v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Curtis Robert Ceno
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?