McCoy v. Stokes et al
Plaintiff: Prince McCoy, Sr.
Defendant: Victorio Gallegos and John T Stokes
Case Number: 2:2018cv00153
Filed: August 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Sidney A Fitzwater
Referring Judge: Lee Ann Reno
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 FILING FEE ORDER -- It is ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. 2. The Court assesses an initial partial filing fee of $0.89 and the agency having custody of plaintiff shall forward the amount of such initial partial filing fee forthwith. (Clerk note: TDCJ Inmate Trust Office has been electronically notified of this order.) Motions terminated: #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Prince McCoy, Sr. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno on 9/10/2018) (awc)
September 10, 2018 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Mon Sep 10 16:43:24 CDT 2018 (crt)
August 21, 2018 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. (Copy of first page of file-marked complaint also mailed to plaintiff.) Tue Aug 21 13:51:04 CDT 2018 (crt)
August 20, 2018 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Prince McCoy, Sr. (awc)
August 20, 2018 Filing 3 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Victorio Gallegos, John T Stokes filed by Prince McCoy, Sr. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (awc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/21/2018: #1 Proposed Summons) (awc).
August 20, 2018 Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (Attachments: #1 General Order Concerning Litigation) (awc)
August 20, 2018 Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Reno (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Reno). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (awc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McCoy v. Stokes et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Victorio Gallegos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John T Stokes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Prince McCoy, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?