Pentz v. USA
Petitioner: George Henry Pentz, III
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 2:2018cv00189
Filed: October 4, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Sidney A Fitzwater
Referring Judge: Lee Ann Reno
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2018 Opinion or Order ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Thu Nov 15 11:06:20 CST 2018 (crt)
November 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Mail returned as undeliverable. #4 Order to Show Cause, received back from George Henry Pentz, III as Return to Sender, Refused by Coleman Federal Prison, Undeliverable as Addressed, Incorrect Name/Register Number. (ID number corrected and document re-mailed.) (awc)
November 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Notice of Substitution of Counsel by AUSA. Amanda R Burch-DOJ added as AUSA. (Burch-DOJ, Amanda)
October 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, NOTICE and INSTRUCTIONS TO PARTIES -- The government is directed to answer this Motion toVacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence within 42 days after entry of this Order. The clerk has served this order and will regenerate notice of the motion and supporting documents to the designated Assistant US Attorney. Wes Hendrix-DOJ for USA added. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno on 10/31/2018) (awc)
October 31, 2018 Opinion or Order ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Wed Oct 31 13:16:39 CDT 2018 (crt)
October 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 AMENDED MOTION to Vacate filed by George Henry Pentz, III. Amendment to #2 Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (vls)
October 5, 2018 Opinion or Order ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1. (Copy of file stamped 1st page of petition also mailed) Fri Oct 5 09:36:06 CDT 2018 (crt)
October 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Criminal Case Number 2:17-cr-0031) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (vls)
October 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (vls)
October 4, 2018 Opinion or Order New Case Notes: A filing fee is not due for this case. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Reno (see Special Order 3). (vls)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pentz v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: Wes Hendrix-DOJ
Represented By: Amanda R Burch-DOJ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: George Henry Pentz, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?