Peraza v. TDCJ Neal Unit
Plaintiff: Marlon Rios Peraza
Defendant: TDCJ Neal Unit
Case Number: 2:2020cv00239
Filed: October 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Matthew J Kacsmaryk
Referring Judge: Lee Ann Reno
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY: Marlon Rios Peraza must address the following deficiencies: Plaintiff has failed to submit an In Forma Pauperis Data Sheet obtained from prison officials or has failed to submit a contemporary In Forma Pauperis Data Sheet; Plaintiff has not paid the $400.00 filing and administrative fee and has failed to submit an Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis substantially in the form currently provided by a Texas federal court, or a copy thereof; Plaintiff has failed to utilize the form provided by the Court for the filing of a civil rights claim by a prisoner; and Plaintiff has not attached a copy of the grievance(s) as required by question no. III. of the complaint form. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiencies is 30 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno on 10/22/2020) (awc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/22/2020: #1 Amended Complaint Form) (awc).
October 22, 2020 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Thu Oct 22 10:23:40 CDT 2020 (crt)
October 16, 2020 Filing 3 COMPLAINT against TDCJ Neal Unit filed by Marlon Rios Peraza. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (awc)
October 16, 2020 Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (Attachments: #1 General Order Concerning Litigation) (awc)
October 16, 2020 Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Reno (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Reno). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (awc)
October 16, 2020 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. (Copy of first page of file-marked petition also mailed to petitioner.) Fri Oct 16 15:35:53 CDT 2020 (crt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peraza v. TDCJ Neal Unit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TDCJ Neal Unit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marlon Rios Peraza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?