Burton v. Keesee Case electronically transferred to Northern District of Texas, Amarillo Division.
| Bobby E Burton, Jr |
| Warden Keesee |
| 2:2021cv00146 |
| July 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Matthew J Kacsmaryk |
| Lee Ann Reno |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (Attachments: #1 Clerk's Response Letter) (daa)
|
|
Filing 6
New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Reno (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Reno). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (daa)
|
|
Filing 5
Case electronically transferred in from District of Texas Southern; Case Number 1:21-cv-00112. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas should seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Copy of NEF to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed.
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE to Nothern District of Texas, Amarillo Division (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ronald G Morgan) Parties notified.(mperez, 1) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 7/27/2021.]
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6,7. Tue Jul 27 13:33:44 CDT 2021 (crt)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. NEF printed page mailed. Tue Jul 27 13:16:25 CDT 2021 (crt)
|
|
Interdistrict transfer to Nothern District of Texas, Amarillo Division. Case transferred electronically. Case terminated on 7/27/2021, filed. (mperez, 1) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 7/27/2021.]
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (EdnitaPonce, 1) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 7/27/2021.]
|
|
Filing 1
Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against Warden Keesee (Filing fee $ 402) filed by Bobby E. Burton, Jr.(EdnitaPonce, 1) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 7/27/2021.]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Burton v. Keesee Case electronically transferred to Northern District of Texas, Amarillo Division. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Bobby E Burton, Jr | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Warden Keesee | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
