Kates v. USA
| David Earl Kates |
| USA |
| 2:2021cv00204 |
| October 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Matthew J Kacsmaryk |
| Lee Ann Reno |
| Prisoner Pet: Motions to Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
REPLY filed by David Earl Kates re: #1 Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255. (nhp)
|
|
Filing 8
RESPONSE filed by USA re: #1 Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255,, #6 Order to Show Cause/Order to Answer,, (Burch-DOJ, Amanda)
|
|
Filing 7
Notice of Substitution of Counsel by AUSA. Amanda R Burch-DOJ added as AUSA. (Burch-DOJ, Amanda)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, NOTICE and INSTRUCTIONS TO PARTIES. The clerk has served this order and will regenerate notice of the motion and supporting documents to the designated Assistant US Attorney. Leigha A Simonton-DOJ for USA added. The government (hereinafter Respondent) is directed to answer this motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence within 42 days after entry of this Order. Deadline to reply to the answer is 28 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno on 10/19/2021) (nhp)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS re: #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno on 10/19/2021) (nhp)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5, 6. Tue Oct 19 12:00:51 CDT 2021 (crt)
|
|
Filing 4
Status Request by David Earl Kates with Deputy Clerk Response. (Attachments: #1 Clerk's Response Letter) (nhp)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3. (Copy of first page of file-marked petition also mailed to petitioner.) Mon Oct 4 08:37:25 CDT 2021 (crt)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (awc)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by David Earl Kates. (awc)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Criminal Case Number 2:97-CR-42-1) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (awc)
|
|
New Case Notes: A filing fee is not due for this case. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Reno (see Special Order 3). (awc)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kates v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: David Earl Kates | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Represented By: | Amanda R Burch-DOJ |
| Represented By: | Leigha A Simonton-DOJ |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
