Washington v. Leeah et al
David Washington |
Benjamin Leeah, Alan Sbar, Melanie Hendrix, Paul Burch and Judith Thomas |
2:2022cv00220 |
November 8, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Matthew J Kacsmaryk |
Lee Ann Reno |
Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER DENYING APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL re: #10 Motion to Appoint Counsel (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno on 12/12/2022) (djs) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:11. Mon Dec 12 16:51:00 CST 2022 (crt) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by David Washington. (nht) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY: David Washington must address the following deficiency: Plaintiff has failed to submit a properly completed In Forma Pauperis Data Sheet obtained from prison officials or has failed to submit a contemporary In Forma Pauperis Data Sheet. Plaintiff has not paid the $402.00 filing and administrative fee and has failed to submit an Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 30 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno on 11/16/2022) (nht) |
Filing 8 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (Attachments: #1 General Order Concerning Litigation) (nht) |
Filing 7 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Reno (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Reno). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno. (nht) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC ORDER transferring case to the Amarillo Division of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Under the authority of Miscellaneous Order No. 6, this action is transferred to the Amarillo Division, where venue is proper. See 28 U.S.C. 1404(a). Plaintiff, a state inmate, filed this pro se civil rights action against prison officials at the Clements Unit within the Amarillo Division, complaining of injuries when he fell off a top bunk. Doc. #3 . Plaintiff has alleged no events that occurred within the Dallas Division. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 11/16/2022) (chmb) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7, 8, 9. Wed Nov 16 17:05:42 CST 2022 (crt) |
NEW CASE NUMBER 2:22-cv-00220-Z Washington v. Leeah et al has been opened following the order of transfer entered in case number 3:22-cv-02506-B-BK. Future filings should reflect only the new case number and be directed to the proper division (see LR 5.1(a)). Clerk to complete new case processing and mail notice of this entry to any party who did not receive it electronically. (twd) |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE OF JUDICIAL SCREENING AND STANDING ORDER. Judicial screening of this case is pending. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2); 28 U.S.C. 1915A(a). It is therefore ORDERED that (1) service of process shall be withheld pending completion of judicial screening, (2) no motions for appointment of counsel shall be filed until the Court has completed the screening process, (3) all discovery in this case is stayed until the Court enters a scheduling order, (4) no amendments or supplements to the complaint shall be filed without prior Court approval, and (5) any motion to amend the complaint must be accompanied by a complete proposed amended complaint on the required form. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff must promptly notify the Court in writing of any change of address by filing a written Notice of Change of Address with the Clerk of the Court. Failure to provide updated address information may result in the dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute or follow court order under Fed. R. Civ. 41(b). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 11/10/2022) (chmb) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Thu Nov 10 14:44:09 CST 2022 (crt) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Wed Nov 9 13:53:10 CST 2022 (crt) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by David Washington. (mlb) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Paul Burch, Melanie Hendrix, Benjamin Leeah, Alan Sbar, Judith Thomas filed by David Washington. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mlb) |
Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (mlb) |
Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. SCREEN case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Toliver (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mlb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.